Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Lipids Health Dis ; 22(1): 195, 2023 Nov 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37964277

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To validate the causal relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) and to identify and quantify the role of triglycerides (TGs) as potential mediators. METHODS: A two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses of T2DM (61,714 cases and 1178 controls) and IVDD (20,001 cases and 164,682 controls) was performed using genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Moreover, two-step MR was employed to quantify the proportionate impact of TG-mediated T2DM on IVDD. RESULTS: MR analysis showed that T2DM increased IVDD risk (OR: 1.0466, 95% CI 1.0049-1.0899, P = 0.0278). Reverse MR analyses demonstrated that IVDD does not affect T2DM risk (P = 0.1393). The proportion of T2DM mediated through TG was 11.4% (95% CI 5.5%-17.4%). CONCLUSION: This work further validates the causality between T2DM and IVDD, with a part of the effect mediated by TG, but the greatest impacts of T2DM on IVDD remain unknown. Further studies are needed to identify other potential mediators.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/genetics , Genome-Wide Association Study , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/genetics , Mendelian Randomization Analysis , Triglycerides
2.
J Dig Dis ; 21(2): 69-80, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31875427

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) accounts for up to 25% of patients with antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD). We aimed to determine which probiotic is most effective in preventing CDAD using a network meta-analysis. METHODS: Studies were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the efficacy of probiotic interventions for CDAD. Primary outcomes were the incidence rates of AAD and CDAD, and secondary outcomes were the duration of diarrhea and the time until onset of diarrhea. The PROSPERO registered number of this study is CRD42018106115. RESULTS: Ten RCTs including 11 analyses and including 4 692 patients were identified. Compared with the control group, probiotic intervention reduced the incidence rates of CDAD (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.17-0.61) and AAD (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.66). Similar results were observed regarding the duration of diarrhea and the time until onset of diarrhea. Meta-regression analysis showed a correlation between the type of probiotic used and the incidence of CDAD and AAD. All nine kinds of probiotic interventions were statistically more effective than the placebo, with Lactobacillus casei ranking as the best intervention (OR 0.19, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.06-0.63) for decreasing the incidence rate of CDAD. L. casei also ranked the highest in reducing the incidence rate of AAD (OR 0.32, 95% CrI 0.14-0.74). CONCLUSION: Lactobacilli strains, especially L. casei, have a good effect on the prevention of CDAD and AAD.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Diarrhea/prevention & control , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/drug therapy , Probiotics/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Child , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Diarrhea/chemically induced , Diarrhea/microbiology , Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Network Meta-Analysis , Odds Ratio , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...